Entire books have been devoted to analyzing genealogical documents and evidence. Today’s post will not be anywhere near that extensive.
However, given that I’ve been in contact with several distant cousins who don’t have much experience delving into primary records – Yes, they are using “books” and online trees as their proof – I thought it would be helpful to share a few things I’ve learned along the way in my own research path. None of these tips are ground breakers, but might help less experienced researchers avoid some mistakes.
- Delayed birth registrations might or might not be correct. When World War II began, a number of Americans and Canadians who had no birth certificate recorded at the time of their births, went to the clerk’s office with an older relative in tow who would swear they were present at the time the person was born on X date and X time to Mother X. some of those making the declarations were only 4 or 5 years older than the person requesting the creation of a birth registration. Even if it was the mother making the declaration, it’s possible that all the details are 100% correct, but it’s also possible that there might be one or more mistakes being recorded. Delayed registrations are just that – documents recorded long after the event took place and are not primary records.
- Death certificates are in a similar category. A death registration is a primary record in terms of the name of the deceased and the date on which he/she died because death certificates are issued very soon after the death of a person. However, some of the details on modern death records are not primary information. Parents’ names, especially if the informant never knew them, might easily be incorrect. From my own first experience, I was thrilled to received the death certificate of my 3X great grandfather, George Tarbox, in the mail. It named his father – John Tarbox!!! The only problem was that George’s father died in 1860 far from Calais, Maine, where George was living. George’s wife predeceased George and his children were toddlers or not even yet born in 1860 and had never met their grandfather. After some digging in Maine records, it turns out that George’s birth was recorded in new Gloucester, Maine and his father was named William. So much for details on a death certificate. Ages are also often incorrectly recorded – either because the informant was unsure or the deceased had been secretive about age when they were living. Those details are secondary information.
- Family Bibles are wonderful keepsakes to own, even more so if they contain handwritten family information. Be aware, though, if the information spans 100+ years and everything is written by one person or the Bible was published long after the events recorded in it, then the information was probably recorded from memory and needs to be verified.
- Transcriptions of primary records and abstracts of the same place a middleman between us and the original record. Mistakes can be, and definitely are, made. Original records should always be checked.
- This item doesn’t fit any one category, but is definitely a pet peeve of mine. Many online trees, and books, give middle names to people who lived long ago in a time and place where middle names were not commonly used. I’ve been contacted by a number of distant cousins who insist that the person had a middle name, but when I ask for a primary document that supports that name, they have none. Instead, it was “online” or “in a book.”
- ThruLines actually fits with #5 above. ThruLines seems to make connections because of the names in online trees. If someone names (with no proof)their earliest ancestor “Xavier Johannes Doodlebug” and places that name in their online tree, then ThruLines offers that (often non-existent) person as the earliest ancestor with DNA connections below it. In my own ThruLines, someone conflated Rev. War Patriot and General John Starkey with another man and turned him into a Loyalist. yet, ThruLines makes it appear that everyone is descended from this conflated person. Evaluate the evidence!
- Last, but definitely not least, we have Artificial Intelligence. As with unsourced trees, those who copy information, but don’t research and evaluate for themselves are accepting AI responses as being accurate. Guess what – Artificial Intelligence lies! Some say hallucinates, but by my thinking, if you challenge the answer and AI says “Yes, I made it up because I wanted to please you,” that is a lie!
There are so many ways to access excellent genealogical evidence today. We are so lucky, but, please, take the time to evaluate what you find. When was the record created and by whom? In what repository was the record found and why was the record created?
Be being a careful researcher, we won’t be duped by middle names that never existed, DNA ancestors who don’t exist or by online trees that are just copy and paste version of other incorrect trees.
I guess this was a mini-rant, which is now done. 🙂
