Category Archives: Artificial Intelligence

Trying Out Research Like a Pro with AI Genealogy Workbook, Part 5

Parts 5 and 6 of my posts are actually covering Chapters 5 and 6 of Research Like a pro with AI Genealogy Workbook.

These are my two favorite chapters in the workbook, probably because I think these are what most AI platforms currently do best – creating locality guides and research plans.

Chapter 5 prompted me to use ChatGPT ‘Deep Research,’ which offers a limited version for free.

I entered the suggested prompt format into the box and an extended locality guide quickly appeared.

Below is a deep-research-oriented coverage of categories and resources — both common and unique — that will help you build genealogical, historical, social, legal, cultural, and economic context for Fairfield County, Connecticut in the 1700s (1700–1799), plus a roadmap to tracking down relevant records, manuscripts, and authored sources from online catalogs, archives, societies, and repositories.


📌 I. Context & Background Categories (Historical & Cultural)

These contextual categories help frame the lived experience of ancestors in 18th-century Fairfield County.

🧭 A. Settlement Patterns & Demography

  • English Puritan settlement beginning 1639, expansion through 1700s.
  • Population structures: town families, household compositions, migratory flows from other CT colonies and New England towns.
  • Town formations: Fairfield, Stratford, Norwalk, Stamford, etc., as evolving civil units.

⚔️ B. Revolutionary War Impact

  • Fairfield was strategically significant during the American Revolution; burned by British forces in 1779, causing population dispersal and property loss.
  • Loyalist vs Patriot loyalties of families — relevant for military and pension records.

🪶 C. Indigenous & African Presence

Extensive presence of enslaved Africans and African-American families; a searchable archival database exists for enslaved people in Fairfield from 1639–1848.

Original Paugussett Algonquian territory and early Native relationships.

Extensive presence of enslaved Africans and African-American families; a searchable archival database exists for enslaved people in Fairfield from 1639–1848

D. Religious & Social Life

  • Congregational church records as key to baptisms, marriages, membership, and community standing.
  • Early ecclesiastical society structures tied to local governance and record keeping.

⚖️ E. Legal & Economic Structures

  • Local courts, probate courts, and colonial law practices (e.g., land division, wills, disputes).
  • Maritime, agriculture, and trade shaped local economies — with account books and merchant records available in archival collections.

📜 II. Primary Records & Genealogical Sources

These are direct genealogical record sources and catalogs where data on individuals and families can be found.

📚 A. Vital Records

Town Clerk & Early Registers

  • Town clerks began recording births, marriages, deaths in the early 1700s — often found in town books and early Barbour vital volumes.

State & Colonial Records

  • Connecticut state archives and the Connecticut State Library hold colonial era records (vital, land, probate, court).
  • Connecticut vital records research guide provides links and catalog strategies.

B. Probate & Will Records

These are gold-standard 18th-century family links:

  • Abstract of probate records at Fairfield, County of Fairfield and state of Connecticut, 1648-1750 (Spencer P. Mead) — contains indices to probate actions.
  • Microfilm for 1648–1757 also available via the FamilySearch catalog (not always indexed).

Where to search/trawl:

  • 📍 FamilySearch Catalog — browse by location: Connecticut – Fairfield – Court/Probate/Land/Church records.
  • Other platforms: Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast for indexed & image sets (subscription possible).

📍 C. Newspapers & Periodicals

✔ Hartford CT Courant Index 1764–1799 available through the Fairfield Public Library — searchable by name, town, topic.

D. Town, Parish, and Church Records

Many church registers provide:

  • Baptisms, memberships, marriages, burial entries.
  • Parish histories (some pre-date civil records and fill glitches).

Strategy: Use town histories (like parish published registers, Church minute books, and transcriptions indexed on FamilySearch).


🗺️ E. Land & Deed Records

  • Many early vital events were recorded in land deed books before separate vital record keeping began.
  • Look for town deed books or Barbour Collection volumes via FamilySearch or CT State Library.

🏙️ III. Archives, Libraries & Special Collections

These institutions are key for offline manuscripts, local volumes, and unpublished records.

A. Local Research Libraries & Museums

Fairfield County Genealogy Society

  • Volunteer-staffed genealogy library with microfilm, indexes, compiled family files, cemetery records, and local books.

Fairfield Museum and History Center

  • Research library with manuscripts, family histories, property info, church and land records. Affiliate library of FamilySearch.
  • Includes specialized collections such as the Fairfield Enslaved Peoples Database.

🏙️ B. State & Regional Archives

  • Connecticut State Library History & Genealogy Unit – colonial records, courthouse data, probate calendars.
  • Connecticut State Archives – court, colonial government records (some digital, many physical).
  • Local public and university libraries – e.g., Yale Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library; Bridgeport Public Library historical collections included in local guides.

IV. Manuscripts, Abstracts & Compiled Works

These authored sources give genealogical data, narrative context, and compiled abstracts.

🔎 A. County Histories & Genealogies (Free Online Copies)

Many key histories are freely digitized via Internet Archive, FamilySearch, etc. Examples include:

  • The History of Fairfield, Fairfield County, Connecticut, from the settlement… 1639 to 1800.
  • Prime ancient society of Fairfield, Connecticut, 1639-1889 – historical manuscript paper.
  • FamilySearch and LDSGenealogy lists dozens of published town and county genealogies.

📦 B. Archival Manuscript Collections

The research files of the Fairfield Museum include:

  • Manuscript collections covering family papers, account books, headstone transcriptions, church registers, etc.

🧠 V. Societies, Journals & Networks

Beyond raw records, these organizations produce indexes, journals, and structured research.

A. Connecticut Ancestry Society

  • Southwestern CT genealogical society with a scholarly quarterly journal and project resources.

🧾 B. Connecticut Society of Genealogists

  • Guides genealogy link lists and references statewide sources including statewide indexes and archival portals.

🛠️ VI. Strategic Research Workflow

Here’s a suggested order for deep genealogical research in Fairfield County 1700–1799:

  1. FamilySearch Catalog
    • Browse by County (Fairfield) → Church/Probate/Land/Tax records.
    • Do not rely solely on indexed data; use Browse Images.
  2. Town Records & Town Clerk Offices
    • Contact individual town clerks for pre-1897 vital records.
  3. Local Libraries & Museums
    • Visit or contact Fairfield Museum & FCGS for unpublished manuscripts, abstracts, cemetery transcriptions.
  1. Published Histories & Manuscripts
    • Use Internet Archive/FamilySearch/Ancestry book collections for genealogies and local histories.
  2. Newspaper Indexes
    • Search the Hartford Courant Index for mentions of people, property sales, probate notices, events.
  3. State Archives & University Special Collections
    • Broaden to Connecticut State Library and Yale Beinecke for manuscripts not held locally.

📍 VII. Tools & Websites to Use

✔ FamilySearch.org – catalog and digital images
✔ Ancestry.com / Fold3.com / MyHeritage – indexed databases and record images
✔ Connecticut State Library & Archives
✔ Internet Archive – free scanned history books
✔ Regional Societies (Connecticut Ancestry Society; Connecticut Society of Genealogists)
✔ Local Libraries (Fairfield, Bridgeport)
✔ Museum Collections – including enslaved peoples databases and manuscript collections

ChatGPT then offered to tailor the locality plan to specific towns and I asked:

Please tailor the recommendations to include Redding, Weston and the original town of Old Fairfield.

Here is a tailored roadmap for deep historical and genealogical research specifically focused on Redding, Weston, and the original portions of Old Fairfield as they existed in the Fairfield County, Connecticut region during the 1700s (1700–1799). I’ve broken it down into contextual information, specific local records, archives & manuscript repositories, and online resources that will help you build context and find primary sources related to individuals, families, and communities in this era.


📜 I. LOCAL HISTORICAL CONTEXT — Redding, Weston, Old Fairfield

Understanding the administrative and parish evolution of these towns helps target the right record sets and jurisdictions when searching for individuals in the 18th century:

📍 Redding

  • Originally part of the inland Long Lots territory of Fairfield, divided into long narrow agricultural parcels intended for settlement since at least the late 1600s. Early land grants and transfers by Fairfield proprietors shaped how Redding developed.
  • Redding became a separate parish in 1729 within Fairfield (due to travel hardship to Fairfield center) and was incorporated as a town in 1767.
  • Redding played a role in the American Revolution, including as a winter encampment area for General Putnam’s Continental troops.

📍 Weston (including Old North Fairfield & Norfield)

  • The area later known as Weston was originally part of Fairfield’s northern lands (the Norfield and North Fairfield parishes).
  • Norfield Parish (centered on what would become Weston) was recognized in 1757, and North Fairfield Parish (east of Norfield, roughly modern Easton) was recognized in 1762. These took their identities from ecclesiastical governing units that levied taxes, built churches and roads, and recorded community events long before secular incorporation.
  • Weston was incorporated as a town in 1787, and Easton later split off from Weston in 1845.

📍 “Old Fairfield” / North Fairfield Context

  • Before town divisions, Old Fairfield referred to inland parcels north of the Fairfield center that later became Redding and parts of Weston/Easton. This North Fairfield Parish formed the religious and civil basis for later towns.

📚 II. GENEALOGICAL RECORD TYPES FOR THESE AREAS (1700–1799)

Below are core source categories and known collections to target for deep research:

✔ Church & Parish Records

These are primary for pre-civil vital events (baptisms, marriages, deaths), administrative decisions, and community governance:

  • Redding Congregational Church:
    • Vital records (1731–1860) compiled by town clerk John N. Nickerson (on microfilm, indexed).
    • Church meetings, membership, baptisms, marriages & death records (1733–1780) in multi-volume church records (members, minutes of ecclesiastical society).
    • Cemetery inscriptions & other early Redding vital data transcribed by Lester Card.
  • Norfield Congregational Church (Weston area):
    • The Norfield Congregational Church records and parish minutes began as early as the 1750s and are crucial for baptisms, marriages and church society governance for Norfield settlers (later Weston).
    • The Norfield Historic District includes surviving 18th- and early 19th-century residences, which helps identify settlement patterns and family landholdings.
  • North Fairfield Parish / Easton Records:
    • Church records for the North Fairfield Parish (later Easton) include baptisms, marriages, and deaths starting in the 1760s.

Tip: Because civil vital records in Connecticut don’t formally begin until 1897, church records are your earliest and most reliable source of personal events in these towns — particularly for individuals born or married in the 1700s.

Town, Parish & Land Records

  • Town Records — Boundaries, land grants, town meeting minutes, road orders, tax lists, etc., were often recorded in early town and parish books. These pre-date standardized civil vital registers.
    • Often scattered across multiple manuscript volumes and microfilms at the Connecticut State Library or in local repositories.
  • Land Records / Deeds — Redding & Weston area deeds and grantor/grantee indexes are available on microfilm at the CT State Library. These can uncover property transfers between family members, which is particularly useful when no vital event is recorded.
  • Probate & Estate Records — Fairfield County probate records (wills, estate inventories, guardianships) cover families across the 18th century and are essential for establishing family relationships and economic context.
    • Indexed and accessible partly through Ancestry, FamilySearch, and American Ancestors collections.

✔ Cemeteries & Gravestone Inscriptions

  • Early cemeteries in Redding and the Norfield/Easton area preserve markers dating back to the 1700s. Some transcriptions and images are indexed at:
    • Redding cemeteries (old burying grounds, Read Cemetery).
    • Local genealogical society projects and USGenWeb archives often have cemetery databases (on CTGenWeb).

III. ONLINE RESOURCES & CATALOGS TO SEARCH

Here are key online catalogs and collections where you can discover primary sources, manuscripts, family histories, and digitized images:

🖥️ Major Catalogs & Digital Libraries

  • FamilySearch.org (LDS / Family History Library)
    • Carefully browse the catalog by location (Connecticut → Fairfield → Redding / Weston / North Fairfield / Norfield) for applicable church, town, land, probate, and cemetery records.
    • Look specifically for microfilm holdings of congregational church records, cemetery transcriptions, and town records (many are already digitized but unindexed by name).
  • Ancestry.com
    • Offers indexed collections of Fairfield County probate, Barbour Collection vital records transcriptions, and some land and town records.
    • Compare against FamilySearch catalog listings to avoid oversights.
  • American Ancestors / NEHGS
    • Includes early Connecticut vital and probate records, especially before 1750 and in NYC-indexed probate groups.
  • Internet Archive / HathiTrust
    • Digitized local histories such as Charles Burr Todd’s “The History of Redding, Connecticut, from its First Settlement …” which contains biographical sketches useful for lineage context.
  • Connecticut State Library / Archives Digital Collections
    • Manuscript collections, original town and parish books, early land and probate holdings —
    • especially pre-19th century records that aren’t indexed elsewhere.
    • Their catalog often lists published and unpublished volumes — including town record series, parish minutes, and Barbour Collection backruns.
  • CTGenWeb & USGenWeb Archives
    • Volunteer-driven collections of cemetery inscriptions, local histories, tax lists, and selected transcriptions specific to Redding, Easton, and the Norfield/Weston area.

📍 IV. OFFLINE ARCHIVES, SOCIETIES & SPECIAL COLLECTIONS

These repositories will have manuscripts, unpublished transcripts, family files, and local histories that are not always indexed online:

🏛️ Local Historical Societies

  • Redding Historical Society – manuscript collections, cemetery reports, and local history files.
  • Weston Historical Society – town histories, family files, maps, early parish documents.
  • Historical Society of Easton, CT – archives for North Fairfield parish, meeting minutes, early educational and church history.

📖 Regional Research Libraries

  • Fairfield Museum and History Center Research Library – comprehensive holdings for pre-1800 genealogy including manuscripts, published genealogies, church & land records, headstone transcriptions, and biographical files.
  • Connecticut State Library History & Genealogy Unit – primary repository for colonial records (town records, Barbour Collection, land & probate).

V. RESEARCH STRATEGY

To maximize genealogical discovery for these towns in the 1700s:

  1. Map the jurisdictional evolution — start by setting up an event timeline so you know which town/entity (Fairfield parish, Redding parish, Norfield parish, North Fairfield parish) held records in a given decade.
  2. Search by parish & church society in the FamilySearch catalog rather than expecting civil records before 1897.
  3. Pull all local land deeds and probate indexed to candidate surnames to build family groups.
  4. Consult cemetery inscriptions and local society transcriptions — especially where no church or town vital records survive.
  5. Leverage local histories and narratives to fill social, economic, and cultural context around family lifeways and community structure.

As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, AI, in my opinion, excels at this type of task. It did an excellent job and I would use this outline to refine my own locality research plan.

Next – on to Chapter 6, Using AI in Research Planning.

Trying Out Research Like a Pro with AI Genealogy Workbook, Part 4

I am moving along through the Research Like a Pro with AI Genealogy Workbook and have reviewed Chapter 4, which is Using AI for Citations.

Again, I am definitely not a fan. I uploaded the 1850 census for Thomas Colman of Calais, Washington, Maine.

I queried Claude using the exact wording and template format as directed in the workbook. Claude was directed to leave blank information it didn’t know and to ask me about it.

This is the result:

Draft Citation:

1850 U.S. census, Manhattan County, Maine, population schedule, Solon, p. 2 (stamped), p. [need penned page number], dwelling [need dwelling number], family [need family number], Thomas Colman; image, “[need collection title],” [need website title] ([need URL]: accessed [need access date]).

Questions for you:

  1. What is the penned page number (handwritten at top)?
  2. What are the dwelling number (column 1) and family number (column 2) for Thomas Colman on line 26?
  3. What is the collection title (e.g., “NARA microfilm publication M432, roll ###”)?
  4. What website did you access this from (Ancestry, FamilySearch, etc.) and what is the URL?
  5. What is your access date?

I could have written a half dozen citations in the time I’ve spent on this and I’m not going to answer Claude’s questions and waste any more time.

the assignment was to create more source citations for sources in my timeline. Airtable was given as an example to gather sources, but the user would need a paid subscription.

Using AI to create citations – not for me!

Trying Out Research Like a Pro with AI Genealogy Workbook, Part 3

The assignment at the end of Chapter 2 required the researcher to create a research objective that will be used throughout the remaining chapters of the workbook.

It has taken me weeks to come up with a research objective. Most of my brick walls are just that because records have run out in the locations I’m searching.

However, I want my foray into this project to be a test of the process, so I’m going with a research question that I’ve just recently been able to prove.

Who are the parents of Loyalist John Adams, born c1740, who married Sarah Coley, daughter of Jonathan Coley and Lucy Sturges, (born 8 June 1743, Fairfield County, Connecticut; died after 1808, probably New Brunswick, Canada) on 31 August 1765 in Weston, Fairfield Connecticut?

Claude refined the objective:

I’ll help you refine this genealogy research objective to make it clearer and more effective for your research.

Refined Research Objective:

Identify the parents of John Adams (b. ca. 1740, location unknown; d. after 1783, possibly New Brunswick, Canada), a Loyalist who married Sarah Coley on 31 August 1765 in Weston, Fairfield County, Connecticut.

Known facts about John Adams:

  • Born: circa 1740 (location unknown)
  • Married: Sarah Coley, 31 August 1765, Weston, Fairfield County, Connecticut
  • Political allegiance: Loyalist during American Revolution
  • Last known location: possibly relocated to New Brunswick, Canada (post-1783)

Known facts about his wife, Sarah Coley:

  • Born: 8 June 1743, Fairfield County, Connecticut
  • Parents: Jonathan Coley and Lucy Sturges
  • Died: after 1808, probably New Brunswick, Canada

Key improvements made:

  1. Separated the subject – Made John Adams clearly the focus, with Sarah’s information as supporting context
  2. Added structure – Organized known facts in a scannable format
  3. Included gaps – Noted “location unknown” for birth to highlight what you’re seeking.
  4. Added context – His Loyalist status and potential Canadian relocation are crucial for tracking records.
  5. Clarified time frames – The post-1783 date helps narrow the Loyalist migration period.

I then questioned:

John’s parents didn’t settle in Canada. Why are his Loyalist status and settling in New Brunswick, Canada crucial for tracking records?

Response:

You’re absolutely right to question that – I made an incorrect assumption. Let me clarify:

Why I was wrong: You’re looking for John’s parents, not John himself. His parents would have been born around 1710-1720 and likely died before or during the Revolution. Their records would be in Connecticut or wherever they originally settled – not Canada.

What IS relevant about John’s Loyalist status:

  • It might explain why there are fewer records of John in Connecticut after 1775-1783 (he may have left)
  • It could mean his parents’ estates or family records were disrupted, confiscated, or lost
  • Local Connecticut records might be silent about the family after John’s departure

What matters for finding his parents:

  • Connecticut vital, church, and land records from roughly 1710-1770
  • Fairfield County probate records (especially 1740s-1770s)
  • Pre-Revolutionary tax lists and town records in Weston and surrounding towns
  • The Coley family connection through Sarah – her family might have known or recorded information about John’s family
  • Any Adams families in Fairfield County in the right time frame

The Canadian connection is only relevant if you’re trying to find records created by John that might mention his parents (like Loyalist claim applications where he might have stated his parentage). But for finding his parents directly, you need Connecticut records from before the Revolution.

My critique on Claude’s response:

While I understand separating out Sarah’s facts from the focus on John Adams, if I was researching on site, I would prefer to have all the relevant facts together in as condensed format as possible, mostly because I take paper notes in person and type them up later. Less space used on the paper means easier to find what I’m looking for in my notes as I work.

However, that’s my personal work style and I have no problem with Claude’s suggested format.

Now, for the tasks with this research objective.

The assignment was to have AI (I used Claude throughout) to create a timeline for people, places, dates and events from a file I already had pertaining to my John Adams.

It produced three files for me to download and I have to say they look terrible. Here’s a snippet from the final timeline:

Way too many words for me. I like my timelines simple and clean. I’d never use this as my own timeline would be way better.

The remainder of Chapter 3 includes suggestions to try the same tasks with more than one AI platform and moving the results to s spread sheet tool and then to analyze the timeline.

The problem with this task is that the document I uploaded to Claude is a modified Word file based on the John Adams history that I wrote myself. At the time, I didn’t know who John’s parents were – I suspected and was proved correct – but didn’t have primary proof.

Therefore, the document would have to have events crated in the time and place where John grew up, which was Connecticut.

Repeating this whole process with one or more other platforms would take more time than I would need to created my own specific timeline.

I am the first to again admit that I use AI for very limited purposes – like creating a locality guide or a research plan – and I’m very unimpressed with the results of my current efforts.

The chapter ends with an assignment to identify sources relevant to my research question.

Using AI reminds me of a format that one of my high school English teachers required us to use to produce a report. The process was basically to teach weaker students how to gather information that could be used to write the final report. The first step was to use note cards and write one fact on each note card. The note cards were then assembled into an order to write our report. The bibliography was finished last.

I was an excellent student who routinely got As on my reports. My brain could process the facts and organize them way faster than writing a fact per card, physically rearranging them and then composing the report.

We had to turn in our note cards for review before working on a draft report.

My solution to this waste of time was to write my final report with bibliography and then go back to create the note cards and draft that had to be turned in. It was way faster than 1) note cards 2) draft 3) final 4) bibliography.

I earned an A on every part of the project!

The reason I’m sharing that story is that I am currently feeling the same way about using AI. I’m NOT knocking the Research Like a Pro process, which is excellent.

I’m just saying it’s not a good fit for me. I don’t need AI to do tasks at which I’m more than capable.

On to Chapter 4.