Sometimes, but especially when investigating difficult families, it is necessary to cast a very wide net. In the case of the Babcock family, who, in my cousin’s case, had family members who never owned real estate, left no wills, don’t show up on tax lists and, for the most part, don’t appear in vital records, a wide net is really really necessary.
In this case, even that wasn’t enough since research was made even more difficult because of the 1790-1830 time period. Not only are census records from that era limited in information, but the New jersey censuses for 1790-1820 are totally missing. That is a hindrance when researching a family that kept hopping back and forth across the New Jersey-New York state line.
However, I did come across one William Babcock, who born in 1775 is just a tad too young to be a possible father for both John and Samuel Babcock, he might be closely related to them given his birth in Haverstraw, then Orange County, New York, but today in Rockland County and the fact that he was a shoemaker by trade.
Actually, I learned quite a bit about William Babcock because he was convicted of grand larceny in Rockland County in 1803, sentence to one year in Newgate Prison and began his sentence on 31 May 1803.
Newgate was the New York state penitentiary from 1797 until 1828 and was located in New York City. Admission records were kept and are extant today.
In 1800, William Babcock was enumerated living in Clarkstown, in the newly formed county of Rockland in New York.
The census indicated a very young family. One male was aged 16-25, one female was 16-25 and there were three children, two males under 10 and one female under 10.
From this, we can glean several probabilities, given that most men married no younger than 21 and there were three children at home.
William Babcock, aged about 25, born c1775
Mrs. Babcock, aged about 24, born c1775
They likely married c1796, probably in Orange County, New York, of which Rockland County was part until it was set off in 1798.
Their children were born c1796, c1798 and c1800.
Therefore, William Babcock married (1) Unknown (MNU), c1795 and this wife apparently died soon as William married (2) Phebe Secor, 21 June 1802, Kakiat, Rockland New York.

Something didn’t go quite right in William’s life, though, because the next year, he was convicted of the grand larceny crime.
The details in the admission page are incredible:


William’s entry is 8th from the bottom of the page and tell us:
William Babock, born Haverstram NY, aged 28, shoemaker, usual residence is Haverstraw, convicted of grand larceny, hair and eyes both brown, 5’10” tall, convicted in Rockland County, sentenced to one year on 31 May 1803.
He appears to be “Willm” Babcock, enumerated in 1810 in Haverstraw, Rockland, New York.

William is seventh from the bottom of the page. The household includes:
Male [aged 26-44]
Female [aged 26-44]
Son [10-15]
Daughter [10-15]
Son [under 10]
Son [under 10]
Daughter [under 10]
Daughter [under 10]
Daughter [under 10]
If the same William Babcock, one son died between 1800-1810. We then find the following family. Of course, which children were born in which order is unknown, but this is a starting point:
William Babcock, aged 35
Phebe, aged about 33
Son, born c1798
Daughter, born c1800
Daughter, born c1802
Son, born c1804
Daughter, born c1806
Daughter, born c1808
Son, born c1810
There is no William Babcock fitting this man in the 1820 census in New York. Might he have moved to New Jersey? Well, the 1820 New jersey census is lost, but there is a William Babcock living in Franklin, Bergen, New Jersey in 1830.
First, a bit about Franklin Township’s history – it was formed in 1771. Next, Pompton Township, New Jersey was set off in 1796 and became part of Passaic County when it formed in 1837. In 1849, Hohokus Township was formed from part of Pompton Township, which leads to Daniel S. Babcock, who was enumerated in 1860 in Hohokus Township, so we have another example of various Babcocks in this branch crossing geographic paths.
Unfortunately, no William Babcock appears in the FamilySearch full-text search in Bergen or Passaic Counties and no William Babcock, aged 70-79, is found in the New York or New Jersey censuses so William might have died by that time.
With no other extant records found, it is impossible to identify who William’s likely children were or what happened to this family.
You never know where research will take you. The prison record gave more information about this man than any other document of its time period, but after that, he remained quite anonymous before being lost to time.
Still, the fact that he appears to have removed to New Jersey – and Hohokus township – makes me wonder about his relationship to Daniel S. Babcock.
I have to admit this is one of the more difficult families I’ve tried to research. Even my Slovak research was easier to document than these Babcock, whose origins extend back to early colonial America.
