Category Archives: Spurr

Case Study: Was the Maiden Name of Rebecca, Wife of John Spurr, William King and Isaac Davenport, BLACKMER? – Part 3

Part 3 of this case study brings us to the male grandchildren of immigrant William Blackmer to determine whether or not one of them could be or is the father of Rebecca (MNU) Spurr King Davenport (c1734-1802) of Dorchester, Suffolk, Massachusetts.


Dorchester Vital Records
Source: American Ancestors

William’s son, Peter, who married Elizabeth (MNU) and Sarah Edwards, 24 October 1711, provides six possibilities – John, Joseph, William, Peter, Stephen and Samuel.

William’s son, John, provides two more possibilities – William and John.

At face value, none of these grandsons stands out as a more likely candidate than the other since their birth years (1690-1710) make them all reasonable prospects for having a child born in the early-to-mid-1730s. Therefore, I need to pick them apart the slow way, person by person.

Let’s look at the children of John Blackmer first, since there are only two possibilities here.

First, William Blackmer was born 20 December 1708. He married Sarah Norcott of Marshfield, Plymouth, Massachusetts after intentions were filed on 23 July 1738. Some have confused him with Peter’s son, born in 1699 because their adult lives overlapped and both had wives named Sarah.


Rochester, Massachusetts Vital Records
Source: American Ancestors

Children, born in Wareham:

  1. Mary, born 4 October 1739
  2. Lydia, born 26 April 1741
  3. Sarah, born 12 February 1743; died 26 February 1743
  4. William, born 31 March 1744; died 30 April 1744
  5. Sarah, born 16 September 1745
  6. Ralph, born 30 July 1747; died 16 August 1747
  7. Experience, born 27 July 1748; died 11 September 1748
  8. John, born 17 March 1752; died 1 April 1752

Because William was almost 30 years old when he married Sarah Norcott, there is a possibility that he had an earlier marriage to a wife who died young, so I can’t rule him out entirely. If William married first about age 25, and a first wife died giving birth to a child, that child could have been born c1733-1737, which matches Rebecca’s estimated birth year range. This William will stay on the potential list for now.

John Blackmer’s other son, John, born 22 April 1710, married Sarah Holmes, 15 March 1731/32 in Plymouth, Plymouth, Massachusetts. This is a well documented line, as it ties into a Mayflower ancestor through one of their children. John died on 28 September 1794.


Rochester, Massachusetts Vital Records
Source: American Ancestors

Children:

  1. Branch, born 27 January 1732/33
  2. John, born 17 September 1734; died 13 December 1734
  3. Sarah, born 20 January 1735/36
  4. John, born 1 March 1737/38
  5. Susannah, born 13 March 1739/40
  6. Mercy, born 24 October 1742
  7. Jerusha, born 20 January 1744/45
  8. Betty, born 4 November 1746
  9. Experience, born 18 May 1750

As you can see, there is no room for Rebecca to fit in this family, so John and Sarah (Holmes) Blackmer definitely are NOT her parents.

Of John’s two sons, then, only William born c1708 remains a candidate.

Now for Peter’s six sons. Here things get a bit messier as families began to move around.

What is known about Peter’s six sons is this:

First – John, born 1690 – He apparently married twice. John Blackmer Jr. married (1) Mary Brickett, 5 March 1711/12 and (2) Sarah Norcott of Marshfield, after intentions were filed on 10 March 1725.


Rochester, Massachusetts Vital Records
Source: American Ancestors

Children of John and Mary, born in Rochester:

  1. Nathaniel, born 3 July 1712; married Rebekah Sampson, 22 May 1740, Duxbury, Plymouth, Massachusetts
  2. Elizabeth, born 12 March 1713/14
  3. Susannah, born 8 July 1716
  4. John, born 21 March 1718 – no further record found.
  5. Mary, born 8 March 1719

I found no children born to Sarah (Norcott) Blackmer, so John is not likely to be the father of Rebecca.

Second – Joseph, born 1687, married Marcy Sears of Yarmouth, 7 January 1724/25.


Rochester, Massachusetts Vital Records
Source: American Ancestors

Children:

  1. Willard, born 6 January 1725/26
  2. Betty, born 29 September 1732
  3. Peter, born 7 August 1735
  4. Hannah, born 7 August 1737

Although tight, Rebecca could fit as a child in this family. Joseph and Marcy are possible parents of Rebecca. It will take more searching to learn more about Joseph and Marcy Blackmer’s family.

Third – William, born 1699, married Sarah Holland, 14 March 1722/23 in Dorchester, Suffolk, Massachusetts.


Dorchester, Massachusetts Vital Records
Source: American Ancestors

Children, born in Rochester:

  1. Marcy/Mary, born 20 March 1724
  2. John, born 11 April 1725
  3. Lemuel, born 11 September 1726
  4. Sarah, born 10 February 1727
  5. Holland, born 5 August 1730
  6. Timothy, born 20 October 1732
  7. Huldah, born 6 January 1735/36

William and Sarah (Holland) Blackmer lived in the section of Rochester which was set off to create the town of Wareham. Sarah predeceased William, dying on 26 February 1743. William died just 14 months later on 30 April 1744.

In spite of the fact that William and Sarah had minor children, no probate or guardianship records have been found for this family. Note, too, that there is a birth gap from October 1732 to January 1736. While they might have lost a child, this fits the estimated birth year range for Rebecca. William and Sarah remain on the list as possible parents for Rebecca.

Fourth – Peter, born 1702; died after 28 August 1764 when he sold a 1/16 interest in a forge in Western (Warren), Massachusetts and probably before 1769 when his son, Peter, sold land to his brother Solomon, but was not called “Junior”; married Hannah Sears, 3 November 1725, Yarmouth, Plymouth, Massachusetts.

Children, first four born in Rochester and last two in Hardwick, :

  1. Roland, born 11 August 1726
  2. Peter, born 1 May 1728
  3. Solomon, born 4 May 1730
  4. Stephen, born February 1734/34
  5. Barnabas, born  21 September 1741
  6. Hannah, born 4 April 1744

With a birth gap from February 1734 to September 1741, it is possible that Peter Blackmer is the father of Rebecca. However, knowing that Peter removed to Worcester County, Massachusetts no later than 1740, it seems unlikely that he was the father of Rebecca.

Fifth – Stephen, born 1704 – Stephen sold several parcels of land in Plymouth County, but no deed mentions a wife. The last deed in which he appears is dated 1747 at which time he was residing in Freeport, Bristol, Massachusetts. Stephen married Abigail (MNU), who filed a petition with the Bristol County Clerk on 4 May 1779 to allow son Joseph Blackmer to administer the estate of her late husband. Some say Salisbury Blackmer is his son. This may be our Stephen, but more research is needed.

Stephen is a possible father of Rebecca, given that so little is known about his children.

Sixth – Samuel, born 1705 – had a deed dated 18 May 1736, but not filed until 28 February 1780, indicating that he had removed to Norwich, New London, Connecticut.

Samuel is a ? as a potential father for Rebecca. However, because he removed to Connecticut by 1746, I am going to assume that he is not her father.

However, I did discover that Samuel married Sarah Giddings, thanks to this Norwich, New London, Connecticut land deed:


Norwich, Connecticut Land Deed, 29 June 1750

There are now four prospective Blackmers remaining who could be Rebecca’s father.

As we move along, it’s become necessary to take closer, more in-depth looks at Peter’s sons – Joseph (b. 1697), William (b. 1699) and Stephen (b. 1704), along with John’s son, William (b. 1708).

 

 

Case Study: Was the Maiden Name of Rebecca, Wife of John Spurr, William King and Isaac Davenport, BLACKMER? – Part 2

On Friday, I introduced a case study  with one hypothesis.

Was the maiden name of Rebecca, wife of John Spurr, William King and Isaac Davenport, all of Dorchester, BLACKMER?

Here is a quick summary of the puzzle pieces so far found:

  1. John Spurr married (2) Rebecca, between 12 February 1753, when first wife Ruth Blake died, and 8 June 1756, when John’s and Rebecca’s first child was born with the most likely time frame being 1754-1755.
  2. Rebecca was probably aged 18-21 when she married John Spurr, given social customs of the day and the 3 September 1779 date of birth of her last child, placing her own year of birth c1733-1736.
  3. Rebecca (MNU) Spurr married (2) William King of Dorchester on 5 February 1783 in Dorchester. He was born c1728 and the only candidate appearing in Massachusetts vital records that might be him is a William King, baptized on 18 May 1729 in Rochester, Plymouth County, Massachusetts. The Rochester connection might be very important here.
  4. Rebecca (MNU) Spurr King married Isaac Davenport on 29 July 1793, again in Dorchester.
  5. Aside from Rebecca’s mention in the probate administration of John Spurr, no further probates have been found for William King, Isaac Davenport or Rebecca Davenport.
  6. The Genealogical and Personal Memoirs of Boston and Eastern Massachusetts (1907), edited by William Richard Cutter and William Frederick Adams, includes the Davenport family history and names Isaac Davenport’s second wife as REBECCA BLACKMER.

Today, I’m jumping right in with a look at the first three generations of William Blackmer, progenitor of the early family in Massachusetts.

William Blackmer was likely born about 1640 in England. While he was the only early settler by this name in Massachusetts, the name isn’t particularly uncommon in England, being found in many counties. William’s origins haven’t yet been proved.

William Blackmer married Sarah Banks/Bankes on 17 July 1666 in Scituate, Plymouth, Masschusetts. The death of William BLACKMOR is noted in Scituate records on 21 April 1676. William’s death is the only entry for Blackmer (of any spelling) up to 1850.

William and Sarah (Banks) Blackmer were the parents of four known children, all recorded in Scituate vital records:

  1. Peter, born 25 May 1667
  2. John, born 16 December 1669
  3. Phebe, born 12 August 1672
  4. William, born 25 February 1675


Source: AmericanAncestors

On 13 September 1679, there was a probate administration for William. William was a young man when he died and left no will. However, there is an interesting deposition in the five page file.

William Blackmore, Estate Administration Deposition

The Deposition of Gillbert Cole John Alleyn & Mary Mashor Testimony aged as may (?)

These Deponents Testifieth and sayeth that they know of an Estate Left in the hands of the Deponent Gillbert Cole of one william Blackmure Deseased and that the Sd william Blackmure and John (Paton?) by the Sd blackmun (Confess??) in his sicknes had made a Covenent betwixt them that whome soever of them two (Other?) & Sd Blackmor Should have the Disposing of the Diseasede partyes Estate and allso they (Did?) (???) tht when the Said Blackmure Layd upon his Death bed of which DeDeseased had Dyed that ye said blackmur in ye Extremity of his sickness Did make one James (?) his Attorney by vurtue of a Leter of Attorny Granted the sd (?) by th esd blackmur Deseased that ye (wood?) might Accte and Doe what hee Could Consorning the (Estate?) which ye sd blackmur should Leave with ye said wood Did Conforme him (?) about it and Did . . . . . . .. . . . .and further theas Deponants saith not

Dated 29 June 1679

The writing is very difficult to read and the remainder with . . . . doesn’t appear to say much except as a closing statement. The important part of this document is that it points to two men being in a vulnerable position facing death and they agreed that if one survived, he would act as estate administrator for the other.

The second page in the file, the administrators’ bond, gives us one more fact about William Blackmer – he is called “William Blackmore Seaman.”


Administrative Bond

What became of William Blackmer’s young family? Widow Elizabeth (Banks) Blackmer married (2) Jacob Bumpas, 24 January 1677 in Scituate, Plymouth, Massachusetts.

  1. Peter Blackmer married (1) Elizabeth (MNU) by 1690, according to Torrey’s New England Marriages to 1700.
    He married (2) Sarah Edwards, 24 October 1711, who he named in his will.
  2. John Blackmer married Anna Branch by 1700, also listed in Torrey.
  3. Phebe Blackmer married Ebenezer Holmes by 1695, cited in Torrey.
  4. William Blackmer died 7 October 1698, unmarried. He left a will disposing of a small estate and appointed Ebenezer Holmes to oversee the bequests.

For the purposes of this case study, only the lines of Peter and John Blackmer need to be followed. Remember when I noted that the birthplace of William King might be important? Well, both Peter and John Blackmer lived in ROCHESTER, Plymouth, Massachusetts. There appear to be definite ties between inhabitants of Dorchester and Plymouth in spite of the 50 miles between them.

First, let’s look at Peter:

Peter, born 25 May 1667, died young like his father, being only 39 years old when he passed away on 17 April 1717. He married (1) Elizabeth, by 1690, and (2) Sarah Edwards, 24 October 1711. However, Peter did leave a three page will, naming wife Sarah and his children. Thee was also an inventory of his estate in the packet, found in File #2102, Plymouth County Court Records.

His last two children were by second wife, Sarah.

Children, all born in Rochester:

  1. John, born 25 September 1690
  2. Elizabeth, who Peter curiously states was called Jane in the will of his brother, William. Her birth name is, indeed, Jane, born 8 December 1693.
  3. Jemima, born 16 November 1695
  4. Joseph, born 4 September 1697
  5. William, born 11 October 1699
  6. Peter, born 21 March 1702
  7. Stephen, born 27 July 1704
  8. Samuel, born 12 April 1705; died young
  9. Samuel, born 20 July 1712
  10. Mary, born 5 November 1714

Guardians were appointed for William, Stephen, Samuel and Mary Blackmer, but no papers were found for a guardianship for Peter, although he was only 15 when his father died.

Any of Peter’s sons are of an age where they could have had a child born c1733-1736, so possible fathers to Rebecca (MNU) Spurr to follow in Peter’s line are John, Joseph, William, Peter, Stephen and Samuel.

Peter’s brother John also married and had a family.

John, born 16 December 1669, married Anna Branch by 1700. John’s death is recorded in Wareham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, where he died on 16 September 1750 in his 83rd year.

Children, all born in Rochester:

  1. Experience, born 5 June 1702
  2. Phebe, born 24 May 1704
  3. William, born 20 December 1708
  4. John, born 22 April 1710
  5. Branch, born 13 August 1712; died 25 June 1714

Possible fathers for Rebecca (MNU) Spurr in this family are sons William and John.

Part 3 of this case study will be posted in a couple of days. Stay tuned!

 

 

 

 

Building a Case Study: William Blackmer, MA 1600s – Part 1

Today, I have a tantalizing mystery. Projects that have caught my interest for the past few months have included hunting down clues for maiden names of ancestresses, mostly in colonial New England, which appear to be unknown.

My latest venture involves one of the wives of John Spurr (1724-1781) of Dorchester, Massachusetts. John is a proven patriot of the American Revolution, being one of the men who answered the Lexington Alarm on 19 April 1775. John married twice. His first wife was Ruth Blake (1721-12 February 1753), who was the mother of his first three children, Lemuel, John and infant Robert, who died the day of his birth, 2 December 1751.

John married (2) Rebecca, mother of his next eleven children – Ann, Thomas, William, Ruth, James, Elisha, Benjamin, Eliphalet, Rebecca, Mary and Sarah. Rebecca had no more children by later husbands.

Ruth, possibly named in honor of John’s deceased first wife,  is my ancestor, born 2 September 1762 and died before 1810. She married Joseph Coleman and they settled in Bowdoinham, Sagadahoc, Maine.

Honestly, I don’t know whether my hypothesis will be supported and proved, disproved or left dangling for a future attempt:

I have looked various times through the years for clues to Rebecca (MNU) Spurr’s maiden name and have come up with zip! However, as I began to dig a bit deeper, one tiny crumb appeared.

Since John died in 1781, leaving quite a few children, I hoped that probate records might provide a crumb trail and they did. John left no will, but there was a clue. In 1784, Rebecca, widow of John Spurr and by then married to WILLIAM KING, was named in the paperwork. I found this marriage record in Dorchester, where the Spurrs lived:


Dorchester Vital Records on American Ancestors

Normally, the “Miss” would concern me, but in this case, the probate record clearly identifies her as the wife of William King and this marriage took place after John Spurr’s death.

Next, I looked for a death record for Rebecca King. None turned up, but I did locate the death record of William King, who died 4 October 1791, again in Dorchester, in the 64th year of his age, meaning he was likely 63 years old, placing his birth c1728. Only one record for a William King born c1728 came up:


Source: AmericanAncestors

William King, the child of John and Sarah of Hampshire County, Massachusetts was baptized on 18 May 1729. This baptism was recorded in ROCHESTER, PLYMOUTH COUNTY, Massachusetts. This might be an important clue as the project unfolds, so keep Rochester in mind.

Dorchester records are quite good, so I looked for a third marriage record for Rebecca.


Source: AmericanAncestors

Isaac Davenport married Mrs. Rebecca King, both of Dorchester, on 29 July 1793.

I checked for death records for both Isaac and Rebecca. Both died in Dorchester.


Rebecca Davenport, died 15 June 1802
Source: AmericanAncestors


Isaac Davenport, died 29 March 1799
Source: AmericanAncestors

Neither William King nor Isaac or Rebecca Davenport have probate files. John Spurr’s estate was somewhat insolvent. Therefore, the only useful crumb in the probate records was the fact that Rebecca married William King.

Google is everyone’s friend, so I decided to look for the trail of Isaac Davenport (since his name was far less common than William King’s) and this is where the very tantalizing clue appeared:


Source: Google Books

Isaac Davenport married (1) Mary Pray, who died in 1792 and (2) Rebecca (BLACKMER) King on 29 July 1793!

This is the one and only clue I have ever seen as to what Rebecca’s maiden name might be. This book, Genealogies & Personal Memoirs Relating to Families of Boston and Eastern Massachusetts, Volume 3, was edited by William Richard Cutter and William Frederick Adams. Mr. Cutter (1847-1918) was a member of the New England Historic Genealogical Society and prolific at publishing genealogical tomes. However, sources were not cited.

That doesn’t mean the statement regarding Rebecca’s name is wrong, it just means there is work to be done. Thus begins my project. We will see where the research trail leads.

To summarize the few known facts:

First, John Spurr married (2) Rebecca, maiden name unrecorded, between 12 February 1753, when first wife Ruth Blake died, and 8 June 1756, when John’s and Rebecca’s first child was born. Given the appropriate mourning period and typical ages at marriage for colonial women, John and Rebecca likely married in 1754 or 1755.

If Rebecca was, say, twenty-one years old at marriage, she would have been born c1733-1734. Her last child was born on 3 September 1779, putting her age at about 45, which is within reason. It is very unlikely that she would have married before the age of 18 in that time period, so she was probably not born any later than 1736.

Second, Rebecca (MNU) Spurr married (2) William King of Dorchester on 5 February 1783 in Dorchester. He was born c1728 and the only candidate appearing in Massachusetts vital records that might be him is a William King, baptized on 18 May 1729 in Rochester, Plymouth County, Massachusetts.

Third, Rebecca (MNU) Spurr King married Isaac Davenport on 29 July 1793, again in Dorchester.

Fourth, Rebecca had no children with William King or Isaac Davenport.

Fifth, aside from Rebecca’s mention in the probate administration of John Spurr, no further probates have been found for William King, Isaac Davenport or Rebecca Davenport.

Last, we have William Richard Cutter’s book, which treats the Davenport family and names Isaac Davenport’s second wife as REBECCA BLACKMER.

That brings me to my research hypothesis:

Was the maiden name of Rebecca, wife of John Spurr, William King and Isaac Davenport, BLACKMER?

I am very thankful that her purported surname isn’t a terribly common one and the Blackmer/Blackmores early in Massachusetts trace back to progenitor William Blackmer of Scituate, Plymouth County, Massachusetts.

Let’s see where this case study takes us.
If you have suggestions along the way, please comment.